22 July 2007

Bush Moves Toward Martial Law(Re-Post)

Posted this, or rather, re-posted much of this on my MySpace blog a few minutes ago.

Don't know exactly how the Administration' s going to implement this directive, or at whom it'll be targeted. It mayn't work out to anything in the end. On the other hand, it just might.

Text follows below.

Don't usually re-post other people's blog posts here, but, given the importance of the issue, I am, and strongly urge those of you who see this to re-post this entry as well on your blogs.

Thanks for your attention, and thanks to MO for originally posting this on her blog.

Just saw this post a minute ago. Am also enclosing a pair of links, one from truthout.org about this, and a link to the Presidential directive from the White House's own site that I saw a few hours ago.

The links are, respectively, http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/072207A.shtml, and http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html.

July 22, 2007 - Sunday

act NOW. Bush moves toward martial law

Please repost this. I took it straight from a bulletin from Active Muse. I am going to try to repost that bulletin here.

Please read this and act now.

Be seeing you.

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: activemuse
Date: Jul 22, 2007 8:56 PM

NEEDED: 3 More Congress Members to Impeach!!!!

Call, Call, Call !!

Please contact your Congressmen/women to push for impeachment. BE RELENTLESS!!

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers has said that if three more Congress Members sign Kucinich's impeachment bill, he will start the impeachment proceedings. (The story was broken tonight by After Downing Street).

Remember, criminal proceedings against Bush, Cheney and others for 9/11 cannot start until they are out of office. Impeachment is the first step.

EVERYONE should call their congressional representatives (especially if yours' are not one of the signatories to Kucinich's impeachment bill) and DEMAND they co-sign. Click here to find your congress person.

REPOST: The dictator criminal Bush and the 5th amendment

From: sache
Date: Jul 22, 2007 11:54 AM

Thanx for posting this. This reminds me of my futile attempts to read the fucking USA Patriot Act. They make this shit incomprehensible with their llabrynthine references to laws by code, and obscurantist kant. Maybe we need to develop an underground core of translators to inform (in plain and comprehensible language) the few amerikkans who are just a tiny bit awake of how they're being raped. AND maybe even wake up a sheeple or two...This is a call to action - volunteers????

Executive Order Overturns US Fifth Amendment
July 20, 2007
Wednesday, the world was a little different. By executive order, the Secretary of the Treasury may now seize the property of any person who undermines efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq. The Secretary may make his determination in secret and after the fact." There hasn't been much media notice of this; the UK's Guardian has an article explaining how the new authority will only be used to go after terrorists.



For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
July 17, 2007

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution ...

Full Story

Bush Moves Toward Martial Law

Interview with writer and researcher, Frank Morales. We discuss the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, signed by the President on October 17, 2006, which allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America, without state or local consent, in order to "suppress public disorder". Also discussed are the actions of FEMA in reponse to Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, and the deliberate dispersal of much of the population. First broadcast on January 10, 2007.

listen here...

Bush Moves Toward Martial Law By Frank Morales

March 7th, 2007
In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1).
It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007? (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."
President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is "martial law."
Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

at dissident news

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I had a random thought the other day... maybe this impeachment business will take a while to gather steam... It's conceivable that, after nearly two more years of raging war and bloodletting in Iraq, the House may not get it's sh*t together on this until the very end of Bush's term. But by then, what if most Democrats and enough Republicans are so fumed at Bush, that they're hell-bent on impeaching him, even though there would be just weeks or days remaining in this godforsaken Administration. Imagine if they don't finish the Articles of Impeachment until, say, around September of 2008. Then the House votes to impeach Bush & Cheney in October 2008. The election is in November, and, assuming Bush doesn't use some pretext to order martial law, or assuming Congress ignores it, then the Senate holds its trial AFTER the election, and, with Bush and Cheney lame ducks, the trial drags through December and most of Jan. 2009, and finally votes to convict both of them only days before the new president takes office on Jan. 20, 2009.

I guess Congress would have to be as mad as most of the people in the country for this to happen... but it COULD happen!

Have a nice day!!

-Joe T.

P.S. - After being convicted by the Senate, the new Attorney General prosecutes and convicts them, and they become the first president and vice president to serve federal time!